(* Title : RComplete.thy ID : $Id: RComplete.ML,v 1.9 1999/09/23 07:05:44 nipkow Exp $ Author : Jacques D. Fleuriot Copyright : 1998 University of Cambridge Description : Completeness theorems for positive reals and reals *) claset_ref() := claset() delWrapper "bspec"; (*--------------------------------------------------------- Completeness of reals: use supremum property of preal and theorems about real_preal. Theorems previously in Real.ML. ---------------------------------------------------------*) (*a few lemmas*) Goal "! x:P. 0r < x ==> \ \ ((? x:P. y < x) = (? X. real_of_preal X : P & \ \ y < real_of_preal X))"; by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [bspec, real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1]) 1); qed "real_sup_lemma1"; Goal "[| ! x:P. 0r < x; ? x. x: P; ? y. !x: P. x < y |] \ \ ==> (? X. X: {w. real_of_preal w : P}) & \ \ (? Y. !X: {w. real_of_preal w : P}. X < Y)"; by (rtac conjI 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [bspec, real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1]) 1); by Auto_tac; by (dtac bspec 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (ftac bspec 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (dtac real_less_trans 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (dtac (real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1) 1 THEN etac exE 1); by (res_inst_tac [("x","ya")] exI 1); by Auto_tac; by (dres_inst_tac [("x","real_of_preal X")] bspec 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (etac real_of_preal_lessD 1); qed "real_sup_lemma2"; (*------------------------------------------------------------- Completeness of Positive Reals -------------------------------------------------------------*) (* Supremum property for the set of positive reals *) Goal "[| ! x:P. 0r < x; ? x. x: P; ? y. !x: P. x < y |] \ \ ==> (? S. !y. (? x: P. y < x) = (y < S))"; by (res_inst_tac [("x","real_of_preal (psup({w. real_of_preal w : P}))")] exI 1); by Auto_tac; by (ftac real_sup_lemma2 1 THEN Auto_tac); by (case_tac "0r < ya" 1); by (dtac (real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1) 1); by (dtac real_less_all_real2 2); by Auto_tac; by (rtac (preal_complete RS spec RS iffD1) 1); by Auto_tac; by (ftac real_gt_preal_preal_Ex 1); by Auto_tac; (* second part *) by (rtac (real_sup_lemma1 RS iffD2) 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (case_tac "0r < ya" 1); by (auto_tac (claset() addSDs [real_less_all_real2, real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1],simpset())); by (ftac real_sup_lemma2 2 THEN Auto_tac); by (ftac real_sup_lemma2 1 THEN Auto_tac); by (rtac (preal_complete RS spec RS iffD2 RS bexE) 1); by (Blast_tac 3); by (Blast_tac 1); by (Blast_tac 1); by (Blast_tac 1); qed "posreal_complete"; (*-------------------------------------------------------- Completeness properties using isUb, isLub etc. -------------------------------------------------------*) Goal "[| isLub R S x; isLub R S y |] ==> x = (y::real)"; by (ftac isLub_isUb 1); by (forw_inst_tac [("x","y")] isLub_isUb 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [real_le_anti_sym] addSDs [isLub_le_isUb]) 1); qed "real_isLub_unique"; Goalw [setle_def,setge_def] "[| (x::real) <=* S'; S <= S' |] ==> x <=* S"; by (Blast_tac 1); qed "real_order_restrict"; (*---------------------------------------------------------------- Completeness theorem for the positive reals(again) ----------------------------------------------------------------*) Goal "[| ALL x: S. 0r < x; \ \ EX x. x: S; \ \ EX u. isUb (UNIV::real set) S u \ \ |] ==> EX t. isLub (UNIV::real set) S t"; by (res_inst_tac [("x","real_of_preal(psup({w. real_of_preal w : S}))")] exI 1); by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [isLub_def,leastP_def,isUb_def])); by (auto_tac (claset() addSIs [setleI,setgeI] addSDs [real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1], simpset())); by (forw_inst_tac [("x","y")] bspec 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (dtac (real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1) 1); by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [real_of_preal_le_iff])); by (rtac preal_psup_leI2a 1); by (forw_inst_tac [("y","real_of_preal ya")] setleD 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (ftac real_ge_preal_preal_Ex 1); by (Step_tac 1); by (res_inst_tac [("x","y")] exI 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [setleD] addIs [real_of_preal_le_iff RS iffD1]) 1); by (forw_inst_tac [("x","x")] bspec 1 THEN assume_tac 1); by (ftac isUbD2 1); by (dtac (real_gt_zero_preal_Ex RS iffD1) 1); by (auto_tac (claset() addSDs [isUbD, real_ge_preal_preal_Ex], simpset() addsimps [real_of_preal_le_iff])); by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [setleD] addSIs [psup_le_ub1] addIs [real_of_preal_le_iff RS iffD1]) 1); qed "posreals_complete"; (*------------------------------- Lemmas -------------------------------*) Goal "! y : {z. ? x: P. z = x + (-xa) + 1r} Int {x. 0r < x}. 0r < y"; by Auto_tac; qed "real_sup_lemma3"; Goal "(xa <= S + X + (-Z)) = (xa + (-X) + Z <= (S::real))"; by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [real_diff_def, real_diff_le_eq RS sym] @ real_add_ac) 1); qed "lemma_le_swap2"; Goal "[| 0r < x + (-X) + 1r; x < xa |] ==> 0r < xa + (-X) + 1r"; by (dtac real_add_less_mono 1); by (assume_tac 1); by (dres_inst_tac [("C","-x"),("A","0r + x")] real_add_less_mono2 1); by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [real_add_zero_right, real_add_assoc RS sym, real_add_minus_left,real_add_zero_left]) 1); qed "lemma_real_complete1"; Goal "[| x + (-X) + 1r <= S; xa < x |] ==> xa + (-X) + 1r <= S"; by (dtac real_less_imp_le 1); by (dtac real_add_le_mono 1); by (assume_tac 1); by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps real_add_ac) 1); qed "lemma_real_complete2"; Goal "[| x + (-X) + 1r <= S; xa < x |] ==> xa <= S + X + (-1r)"; (**) by (rtac (lemma_le_swap2 RS iffD2) 1); by (etac lemma_real_complete2 1); by (assume_tac 1); qed "lemma_real_complete2a"; Goal "[| x + (-X) + 1r <= S; xa <= x |] ==> xa <= S + X + (-1r)"; by (rotate_tac 1 1); by (etac (real_le_imp_less_or_eq RS disjE) 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [lemma_real_complete2a]) 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [(lemma_le_swap2 RS iffD2)]) 1); qed "lemma_real_complete2b"; (*------------------------------------ reals Completeness (again!) ------------------------------------*) Goal "[| EX X. X: S; EX Y. isUb (UNIV::real set) S Y |] \ \ ==> EX t. isLub (UNIV :: real set) S t"; by (Step_tac 1); by (subgoal_tac "? u. u: {z. ? x: S. z = x + (-X) + 1r} \ \ Int {x. 0r < x}" 1); by (subgoal_tac "isUb (UNIV::real set) ({z. ? x: S. z = x + (-X) + 1r} \ \ Int {x. 0r < x}) (Y + (-X) + 1r)" 1); by (cut_inst_tac [("P","S"),("xa","X")] real_sup_lemma3 1); by (EVERY1[forward_tac [exI RSN (3,posreals_complete)], Blast_tac, Blast_tac, Step_tac]); by (res_inst_tac [("x","t + X + (-1r)")] exI 1); by (rtac isLubI2 1); by (rtac setgeI 2 THEN Step_tac 2); by (subgoal_tac "isUb (UNIV:: real set) ({z. ? x: S. z = x + (-X) + 1r} \ \ Int {x. 0r < x}) (y + (-X) + 1r)" 2); by (dres_inst_tac [("y","(y + (- X) + 1r)")] isLub_le_isUb 2 THEN assume_tac 2); by (full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [real_diff_def, real_diff_le_eq RS sym] @ real_add_ac) 2); by (rtac (setleI RS isUbI) 1); by (Step_tac 1); by (res_inst_tac [("R1.0","x"),("R2.0","y")] real_linear_less2 1); by (stac lemma_le_swap2 1); by (ftac isLubD2 1 THEN assume_tac 2); by (Step_tac 1); by (Blast_tac 1); by (dtac lemma_real_complete1 1 THEN REPEAT(assume_tac 1)); by (stac lemma_le_swap2 1); by (ftac isLubD2 1 THEN assume_tac 2); by (Blast_tac 1); by (rtac lemma_real_complete2b 1); by (etac real_less_imp_le 2); by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [isLubD2]) 1 THEN Step_tac 1); by (full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [real_add_assoc]) 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [isUbD] addSIs [setleI RS isUbI] addIs [real_add_le_mono1]) 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [isUbD] addSIs [setleI RS isUbI] addIs [real_add_le_mono1]) 1); by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [real_add_assoc RS sym, real_zero_less_one])); qed "reals_complete"; (*---------------------------------------------------------------- Related: Archimedean property of reals ----------------------------------------------------------------*) Goal "0r < x ==> EX n. rinv(real_of_posnat n) < x"; by (stac real_of_posnat_rinv_Ex_iff 1); by (EVERY1[rtac ccontr, Asm_full_simp_tac]); by (fold_tac [real_le_def]); by (subgoal_tac "isUb (UNIV::real set) \ \ {z. EX n. z = x*(real_of_posnat n)} 1r" 1); by (subgoal_tac "EX X. X : {z. EX n. z = x*(real_of_posnat n)}" 1); by (dtac reals_complete 1); by (auto_tac (claset() addIs [isUbI,setleI],simpset())); by (subgoal_tac "ALL m. x*(real_of_posnat(Suc m)) <= t" 1); by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [real_of_posnat_Suc,real_add_mult_distrib2]) 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [isLubD2]) 2); by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [real_le_diff_eq RS sym, real_diff_def]) 1); by (subgoal_tac "isUb (UNIV::real set) \ \ {z. EX n. z = x*(real_of_posnat n)} (t + (-x))" 1); by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [isUbI,setleI]) 2); by (dres_inst_tac [("y","t+(-x)")] isLub_le_isUb 1); by (dres_inst_tac [("x","-t")] real_add_left_le_mono1 2); by (auto_tac (claset() addDs [real_le_less_trans, (real_minus_zero_less_iff2 RS iffD2)], simpset() addsimps [real_less_not_refl,real_add_assoc RS sym])); qed "reals_Archimedean"; Goal "EX n. (x::real) < real_of_posnat n"; by (res_inst_tac [("R1.0","x"),("R2.0","0r")] real_linear_less2 1); by (res_inst_tac [("x","0")] exI 1); by (res_inst_tac [("x","0")] exI 2); by (auto_tac (claset() addEs [real_less_trans], simpset() addsimps [real_of_posnat_one,real_zero_less_one])); by (forward_tac [(real_rinv_gt_zero RS reals_Archimedean)] 1); by (Step_tac 1 THEN res_inst_tac [("x","n")] exI 1); by (forw_inst_tac [("y","rinv x")] real_mult_less_mono1 1); by (auto_tac (claset(),simpset() addsimps [real_not_refl2 RS not_sym])); by (dres_inst_tac [("n1","n"),("y","1r")] (real_of_posnat_less_zero RS real_mult_less_mono2) 1); by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [real_of_posnat_less_zero, real_not_refl2 RS not_sym, real_mult_assoc RS sym])); qed "reals_Archimedean2";